Paul Bossart, Earth Scientist, Switzerland

„It’s about credibility and transparency“

Paul Bossart studied earth sciences at the ETH Zurich and received a PhD in structural geology. In 1989 he began conducting research in various rock laboratories (Grimsel in Switzerland, Kamaishi in Japan and Äspö in Sweden). In 1996 he established the Mont Terri rock laboratory and has been director of the rock laboratory since 2006. Mont Terri is operated by swisstopo.

 "I feel like I'm in my element in the mountains, which is why I studied geology. I’m fascinated by the dynamics of the Earth: continents moving over huge periods of time, mountains rising and levels being razed. I dealt with this subject in my dissertation, namely the question of why the Himalaya mountain range in Pakistan changed its east-west orientation to a north-south one. It has to do with the opposing pressure of the continental plates. After my PhD at the ETH Zurich, I worked in the private sector, where I was able to establish the Mont Terri rock laboratory in the canton of Jura. I was involved in a project in the Grimsel rock laboratory five years ago, where I became familiar with the National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra) and its work. At this time granite was considered the ideal medium for containing radioactive waste. The first exploratory drilling in northern Switzerland sought to determine if this was the ideal terrain for disposing radioactive waste. The Scandinavians and Japanese had also researched granite. At the beginning of the 1990s, I worked in a rock laboratory in northern Japan and in Äspö in Sweden between 1993 and 1995. During this time, Belgian geologists had examined a clay for its suitability as a containment medium, the so-called Boom Clay – with encouraging results.
Unlike other countries, the bedrock in Switzerland is young, lively in the sense of active movements, complex and multi-stoned. It’s precisely for this reason that several possible types of rocks were tested for their suitability as a containment medium, including Opalinus Clay. Nagra is still committed to granite, but increasingly more Swiss geology experts are calling for studies into disposing highly radioactive waste in impermeable sedimentary rocks. Unlike granite, Opalinus Clay has far less difficulties with water because it's practically watertight and therefore encased, i.e. stagnant. This is a decisive advantage in long-term disposal because radionuclides trapped in clay cannot be transported into the biosphere with water. At Mont Terri, a horizontal tunnel in the mountain was formed when a motorway was constructed, which means that a layer of potential host rock is ready to be explored. It presents the ideal conditions for a laboratory since the question of disposing radioactive waste is not at issue here.
For the canton of Jura, it was clear from the outset that managing this should not be placed in the hands of Nagra. The federal government had to assume responsibility for the Mont Terri rock laboratory whether it wanted to or not. At first, the Federal Office for Water and Geology was the responsible authority and afterwards swisstopo, who I work for. swisstopo has been operating the laboratory since 1996 with its own staff, and it's growing quickly: 44 experiments are in progress and more are planned – just like the expansion of the entire rock laboratory. This is because increasingly more countries are exploring the possibility of using clay as a containment medium. As director, I actively participate in planning the experiments and also have the opportunity with our team to conduct my own experiments. In something as important as disposing highly radioactive waste, we have to try to refute every hypothesis until we can establish that they correspond to the facts. We cannot afford any mistakes: we have to uncover every weakness in a disposal concept and be credible and transparent until the very last point. Only then is there the chance to convince the population living in the region where the repository will be built that they should consent to this."


Who we are

Founded in 2012, the Association for Sustainable Journalism on the Internet is committed to high-quality, independent on-line journalism that stands the test of time. The association promotes and runs journalistic websites dedicated to topics that are hardly covered any more in conventional media. Its members include journalists, photographers, designers and web designers.

Pressbüro Seegrund, which was founded in 1989, is firmly established in the media landscape. Its focus is on feature reports, reportage and non-fiction books. It has launched a number of online magazines in recent years including www.alpenmagazin.org, www.mangel-und-moral.org, and the latest creation: www.mensch-und-atom.org.

About

Publisher:
Association for Sustainable Journalism in Internet,
Neugasse 30,
CH-9000 St. Gallen

 

Editor:
Pressebüro Seegrund,
Neugasse 30, PO Box 445,
CH-9004 St. Gallen,
Tel. +41(0)71 671 10 73,
www.seegrund.ch,

 

Website design and programming:
Eveline Arnold Ukaegbu, Proclamation,
Zypressenstrasse 138,
CH-8004 Zürich,
www.proclamation.ch

 

English translation:
Elana Summers

 

Russian translation:
Alexej Scherbakov

 

Local interpretors: Galina Kovalch (Belarus),
Irina Gasanova (Ukraine), Chikako Yamamoto (Japan)

 

Authors:
Martin Arnold, freelance journalist, author and media entrepreneur for the past 30 years
Urs Fitze, freelance journalist, reportage on politics, the economy, science, travel and the environment" target="_blank">www.seegrund.ch,

 

 

Our Aim

Without provoking or causing a scandal, www.society-and-the-atom.org wants to shake things up a bit by encouraging society to reflect on a subject that affects all of us: nuclear power. It is a subject that polarises, turning opponents and supporters into ideologues. And it is a subject that divides the informed and the uninformed in a way that creates intentional and unintentional dependencies. Against the background of the current debates on the 'energy transition', we want to contribute a critical discussion for all those who want to more know about nuclear power. And we want to do our bit to overcome the deep ideological divide that separates supporters and opponents. When it comes to this subject, the truth very quickly becomes relative – or is made relative. You move around in an area where experts, opinion makers, ideologues, affected persons, victims, lobbyists, politicians and world saviours jostle against each other. Everyone should be able to have their say, to tell their truth. The truth of the radiation victims as well as that of the power plant operators, the supporters and the opponents. The second objective of the book is to explore the many facets of truth – and remain receptive to all those who want to make it comfortable for us.

Newsletter Signup

Stay informed on our latest news, Updates and new template.