Robert Spaemann, Philosopher, Germany

“Technology and democracy are growing apart”

Robert Spaemann is a philosopher and was a professor of philosophy at the universities of Stuttgart, Heidelberg and Munich. He has also made a name for himself as the author of topical contributions on ethical, political and religious issues in national newspapers. His opinions on nuclear energy are expressed in his book “After us, the nuclear meltdown”. A Catholic, he was also an advisor to Pope Benedict XVI.

“I think that the dangers arising from nuclear energy production can be minimised with maximum professionalism and seriousness. But this doesn’t solve the fundamental problem of nuclear waste disposal. And this is the crux of the matter. There is no permanent disposal site, and so there should also be no nuclear energy production. For this reason I believe that Germany reached the right decision when it chose phase out nuclear energy. All known civilisations are only a few thousand years old, and we have seen how their knowledge falls into oblivion. How can we then expect that people in 10,000 or more years will know what we wanted to tell them when we designate a permanent disposal site? I am astounded by the naivety to believe that this is possible. I sometimes wonder why this technology prevailed. 'You will be like God,' promised the serpent, when it tempted Adam and Eve with the forbidden fruit. It seems almost like a divine act to reap unbelievable amounts of energy from a piece of uranium. I’m reminded of the words of Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb, who described the atomic bomb as 'technically so sweet'. With him, the inconsistency around dealing with nuclear energy is clear. As a researcher he was fascinated, but as a human being he turned against using the atomic bomb. Who now bears the consequences of atomic energy? No one can. When it comes to providing for our children and grandchildren, for our family tribe, we think about the consequences of our decision. But this concern seems to dry up on a collective level. I used to give a lot of thought to humankind and how we technically intervene in nature. It's about two conflicting attitudes: first, to dominate nature, which is necessary to some extent for humans to survive, and second, the need to see ourselves as a part of nature. Both belong in equal measure. The traditional European moral is enough to make the correct decision in these matters and needs neither new answers nor a new moral. It’s a question of balance. We simply need to use the intellectual tools that already exist. Even if I’m of the opinion that it would have been better to have never started with nuclear energy, we now have the problem with the waste. On the one hand, we have the interests of society to house the permanent disposal site in the geologically most suitable soil, and on the other hand, are the people living at this location who may not want this but will nonetheless have to accept it against their will. This example shows that the gap between technological development and democracy continues to widen.”

Who we are

Founded in 2012, the Association for Sustainable Journalism on the Internet is committed to high-quality, independent on-line journalism that stands the test of time. The association promotes and runs journalistic websites dedicated to topics that are hardly covered any more in conventional media. Its members include journalists, photographers, designers and web designers.

Pressbüro Seegrund, which was founded in 1989, is firmly established in the media landscape. Its focus is on feature reports, reportage and non-fiction books. It has launched a number of online magazines in recent years including,, and the latest creation:


Association for Sustainable Journalism in Internet,
Neugasse 30,
CH-9000 St. Gallen


Pressebüro Seegrund,
Neugasse 30, PO Box 445,
CH-9004 St. Gallen,
Tel. +41(0)71 671 10 73,,


Website design and programming:
Eveline Arnold Ukaegbu, Proclamation,
Zypressenstrasse 138,
CH-8004 Zürich,


English translation:
Elana Summers


Russian translation:
Alexej Scherbakov


Local interpretors: Galina Kovalch (Belarus),
Irina Gasanova (Ukraine), Chikako Yamamoto (Japan)


Martin Arnold, freelance journalist, author and media entrepreneur for the past 30 years
Urs Fitze, freelance journalist, reportage on politics, the economy, science, travel and the environment" target="_blank">,



Our Aim

Without provoking or causing a scandal, wants to shake things up a bit by encouraging society to reflect on a subject that affects all of us: nuclear power. It is a subject that polarises, turning opponents and supporters into ideologues. And it is a subject that divides the informed and the uninformed in a way that creates intentional and unintentional dependencies. Against the background of the current debates on the 'energy transition', we want to contribute a critical discussion for all those who want to more know about nuclear power. And we want to do our bit to overcome the deep ideological divide that separates supporters and opponents. When it comes to this subject, the truth very quickly becomes relative – or is made relative. You move around in an area where experts, opinion makers, ideologues, affected persons, victims, lobbyists, politicians and world saviours jostle against each other. Everyone should be able to have their say, to tell their truth. The truth of the radiation victims as well as that of the power plant operators, the supporters and the opponents. The second objective of the book is to explore the many facets of truth – and remain receptive to all those who want to make it comfortable for us.

Newsletter Signup

Stay informed on our latest news, Updates and new template.